Cairo Papers Vol. 31, No. 2

Law as a Tool for Empowering Women within Marital Relations: A Case Study of Paternity Lawsuits in Egypt
ISBN13: 9789774165085ISBN10: 977416508X Paperback, 112 pages
Aug 2011,  In Stock

Price:

$19.95 (06)

A Publication of The American University in Cairo Press

Description

How do women use courts within the context of paternity lawsuits? This study analyzes the challenges that the formal legal approach to empowering women faces once it is translated into everyday socio-legal experiences and court repertoires. It also seeks to trace the pathologies inherent in personal status law reform and normal legal practices in Egypt, attesting to the limitations of law as an agent of social change in the private domain of the family. It mainly sheds light on the difficulties of separating formal legal rules from informal social practices. It also explores the problem of paternity claims in Egypt. Adding to growing literature on the use of legal mobilization to advance gender equity, this study offers insights on the often-neglected role of social norms in court experiences, often leading to unexpected consequences that sometimes defy the intended goals behind policies and legislation.

Features

  • One of the few books that deal with this growing issue.

Product Details

112 pages; 5.5 x 7.5; ISBN13: 978-977-416-508-5ISBN10: 977-416-508-X

About the Author(s)

Hind Ahmed Zaki is PhD candidate at the University of Washington, Department of Political Science.

Add to Cart button
Add to Cart button

Consider these titles...

EU Electronic Communications Law

$400.00 Paperback Nov 2011
An established authority in the field, this is the core reference work for practitioners on electronic communications in the European Union.

Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration

$90.00 Paperback Oct 2009
Comprehensive and thought-provoking discussion of the role of human rights in international investment law, both before investment tribunals and regional courts
Provides the most comprehensive examination ever undertaken of the influence of U.S. Supreme Court amicus briefs