« Home

Home » Law » Trusts & Equity » Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts » Resources » Multiple choice questions » Chapter 15

Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts

Chapter 15

Instructions

Choose your answers from a-d by clicking the radio button next to each choice and then press 'Submit' to get your score.

Question 1

The best way for an unmarried, cohabiting couple to protect their respective claims to their shared home is to:

Question 2

A person may claim an equitable interest in a property under a resulting trust if:

Question 3

If a claimant is successful in claiming an equitable share in a house under a proprietary estoppel, the size of that share is:

Question 4

There are two categories of trust in Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset 1991 1 AC 107. The first category is based upon an oral agreement between the parties and one of the parties relying on that agreement and acting to their detriment. The oral agreement:

Question 5

Which of the following would not qualify as detrimental reliance?

Question 6

The second category of trust in Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset 1991 1 AC 107 applies where no oral agreement to share can be found. Instead the claimant must show that they made a financial contribution. Which of the following would not qualify as a financial contribution?

Question 7

When the court decides the size of the couple's respective shares what is the most important and determining factor?

Question 8

According to Stack v Dowden 2007 2 All ER 929 if the couple have purchased a house in joint legal names it is presumed that they intend to hold the house in equal beneficial shares e.g. 50/50. Why did the court decide that Mr Stack and Ms Dowden did not in fact hold equal shares?

Question 9

The majority of judges in Stack v Dowden 2007 2 All ER 929 held that the trust in this area of the law was a constructive trust, but Lord Neuberger thought it was a resulting trust. If it had been a resulting trust, what difference would this have made to outcome of the case?

Question 10

The Law Commission report, 'Sharing Homes' recommended a number of reforms of the law which could be adopted by judges. Which of the following did they not recommend?