Skip navigation
« Home
Home » Law » Trusts & Equity » Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts » Resources » Multiple choice questions » Chapter 12
Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts
Choose your answers from a-d by clicking the radio button next to each choice and then press 'Submit' to get your score.
Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier (1841) Cr & Ph 240, the beneficiaries may:
What is unusual about the decision in Hambro v Duke of Marlborough [1994] Ch 158?
An 'arrangement' under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 allows the court:
Under section 1 (1) of the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 the court may give its consent to a variation for those who cannot consent for themselves. For which of the following could the court not give its consent?
In which of the following situations should the court refuse consent to a variation of trust?
Why did Lord Denning not allow the proposed variation of trust in Re Weston [1969] 1 Ch 223?
Why was the variation of trust agreed in In Re Remnant's Settlement Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 560?
When a variation is authorised in order to save tax, the court must be satisfied that