« Home

Home » Law » Trusts & Equity » Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts » Resources » Multiple choice questions » Chapter 12

Clements and Abass: Complete Equity and Trusts

Chapter 12

Instructions

Choose your answers from a-d by clicking the radio button next to each choice and then press 'Submit' to get your score.

Question 1

Under the rule in Saunders v Vautier (1841) Cr & Ph 240, the beneficiaries may:

Question 2

What is unusual about the decision in Hambro v Duke of Marlborough [1994] Ch 158?

Question 3

An 'arrangement' under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 allows the court:

Question 4

Under section 1 (1) of the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 the court may give its consent to a variation for those who cannot consent for themselves. For which of the following could the court not give its consent?

Question 5

In which of the following situations should the court refuse consent to a variation of trust?

Question 6

Why did Lord Denning not allow the proposed variation of trust in Re Weston [1969] 1 Ch 223?

Question 7

Why was the variation of trust agreed in In Re Remnant's Settlement Trusts [1970] 1 Ch 560?

Question 8

When a variation is authorised in order to save tax, the court must be satisfied that