Skip to main content

Discussion & Conclusions

Chapters 24 & 26

Page 563

Discussion

  1. Reflect on the implications of your findings for the research questions that have driven your research; in other words, how do your results illuminate your research questions?
  2. If, like Coyle-Shapiro and Kessler (2000), you have specified hypotheses, the discussion will address whether the hypotheses have been confirmed or not - if not, you might speculate about possible reasons for, and the implications of, their refutation
  3. In the case of Perlow's (1999) article, section 6 acts as a discussion section, the author bringing out the main theoretical contribution of her research - the idea of the 'vicious work-time cycle' - and exploring its implications

Conclusion

  1. A Conclusion is not the same as a summary:
    1. however, it is useful to bring out your argument thus far, relating your findings and discussion to your research questions and hammering home to your readers the significance of what you have done
  2. You :-
    1. should clarify the implications of your findings for your research questions
    2. might suggest ways in which your findings have implications for theories relating to your area of interest
    3. might suggest ways in which your findings have implications for practice in the field of business and management
  3. With the benefit of hindsight you might draw attention to any limitations of your research:
    1. it is probably best not to overdo this element and provide examiners with too much ammunition that might be used against you!
  4. It is often valuable to propose areas of further research that are suggested by your findings:
    1. but avoid engaging in speculations that take you too far away from your data, or that cannot be substantiated by the data, and introducing issues or ideas that have not previously been brought up
  5. Also see - p.522 & 526 on discussions & conclusions in writing up quantitative and qualitative research