Page xxix: Table of cases
R v Manchester City Youth Court (2002): the citation should read ‘EWHC 564 (Admin) QBD; CrimLR [2006] 849’.

Page 78: the penultimate line of the first paragraph should read as follows ‘(CJI) Act 2008 s10’.

Page 84: Checklist

In point 2 the legislation in parentheses on line 1 should read as follows ‘PCCSA 2000’.

Page 109: 3.5.2 Case Study

The Fraud Act 2006 Schedule 1 para 1 repealed s15 of the Theft Act 1968. Jemma would now probably be charged with fraud by false representation under s2 of the Fraud Act, which has been in force since Jan 2007. Further, if she were sentenced in 2008 she would have been given a community rehabilitation order for a conviction 5 years earlier, not a probation order (See, also, Guidance for end-of-chapter questions, chapter 3.)

Page 158: IPP sentences
In the first paragraph the quote from Rose LJ in Lang (2005) should read as follows ‘a new, more restrictive, criterion for seriousness’.