Skills for Law Students is an innovative online resource which covers all of the skills that law students need to understand and develop during the course of their law degree. It includes clear, practical advice on how to develop key skills as well as over 170 interactive activities to test progress and to help put the theory into practice.
About this site
 

From the Publisher

Skills for Law Students is an innovative online resource which covers all of the skills that law students need to understand and develop during the course of their law degree. It includes clear, practical advice on how to develop key skills as well as over 170 interactive activities to test progress and to help put the theory into practice.

  • Interactive activities
  • The site contains over 170 interactive activities which are designed to help you understand the topics better; to put the skills into practice; and to enable you to self-study and receive immediate feedback on your progress.

    Why not get started with activity 1: the 'skills audit' in the Introduction to test how much you already know about law and how law affects our day-to-day lives?

  • Video recordings
    There are over 50 video recordings throughout the site for you to watch and listen to. These will not only add more variety and interest to your learning; they will also enable you to see good and bad practice of some of the more practical skills (such as presentation skills and mooting).

    The video clips also show you current law students and legal practitioners reflecting on the skills they have developed and the skills which are key to their careers.

  • Reflective diary
  • At various points throughout the site you will be encouraged to reflect upon something you have just read or done. You can then click on the reflective diary link (which appears on every page) to log your thoughts. This could then feed into your personal development plan at university.

  • Hyperlinked glossary
  • We have provided definitions for any words or phrases we think you might not be familiar with. Simply click on the word to see the definition before continuing with your reading.

  • Cross references
  • Whatever you undertake in your studies, you will realise that a combination of different skills are required for most tasks. Some skills are very closely related to others and we highlight links between topics throughout the resource with numerous hyperlinked cross-references. This will enable you to navigate your way around the site and to see how various topics interlink.

  • Your scores
  • Your scores are recorded on your 'my test scores' page. This page will be updated every time you complete an activity and you can re-take the activities as many times as you like. Why not use this page to evaluate where your strengths and weaknesses lie and which areas you may want to focus on for development?


From the Authors

It would be difficult for us to present this new online resource and accompanying textbook as the culmination of a long planned endeavour. It is more the result of a series of fortuitous encounters, serendipitous conversations and shared concerns. Our drivers are twofold; first, a belief that the diversity of student experience prior to entering higher education means that lecturers cannot, if indeed they ever could, take what students know for granted, and second, the realisation that transformations in technology mean that the textbook, if it is to remain a useful tool for the student, must evolve. It needs to respond to the immediate needs of the students in a useful and purposeful manner.

We have chosen to focus on legal skills in part because they provide an opportunity for us to test our ideas and to see what can be achieved, and in part because we are all becoming so much more aware of the underpinning role of skills in ensuring academic and vocational success. However we do think our approach could be transferred to textbooks covering substantive law areas, and we look forward to watching new projects emerge.

However innovative our writing task has been, we would still like to take this opportunity to deliver traditional courtesies. This resource would not have been possible without the support of our colleagues and students at Kent Law School. They have been enthusiastic and generous. Particular thanks go to Nick Jackson and Rosemary Hunter for agreeing to be filmed, and to Alan Thomson and John Wightman whose shared experience and wisdom have ensured that teaching, learning and students remain as important as research in our law school agenda. Our students gave up weekends in the summer to participate in the project and we are grateful and wish them all the best in their future careers. Many of our friends in the legal profession gave up their time too. We know how busy they are and appreciate their involvement. We think their perspective is particularly valuable for students beginning their legal education. There is one person without whom this book would not have happened. Sarah Viner has been an extraordinary editor; she has enthused, organised, and cajoled us to ensure that we have given the best we could to this project. She has worked so hard to help us achieve our ambitions and we are very very grateful.

We would also like to thank each other. It's been a real joy working as a team, learning from each other, and sharing experiences which between us cover a huge range of legal education.

Helen would like to thank her family. Richard and Rowan have been more interested in this project than any other she has been involved in, and their observations and contributions have been invaluable. She would like to thank Hugh Brayne and Stephen Cottle for their patience when their projects have been delayed because the project took more time than planned. She would also like to thank two particularly gifted teachers of law, Leslie Sheinman and Mic Jeeves who taught her to take legal education seriously and whose ideas and enthusiasms she has drawn on, perhaps more than she has been aware, throughout the resource.

Sarah is indebted to her colleagues in the law librarian profession who have supported her over the years, in particular Sue Pettit, Cathie Jackson and Steven Whittle, who know how much she owes them, and Guy Holborn, whose erudite and witty book on legal skills is always at her right hand. Her long association with Kent Law School, and Nick Jackson in particular, has been inspirational, and she would also like to extend thanks to all the law and technology people at Warwick University. Finally, her part of this enterprise is dedicated to her twin grand daughters, Agnes and Molly, who arrived just in time to distract her from the work in hand, and who are therefore totally responsible for any deficiencies.

Kirsty has many people to thank, some of whom have already been mentioned, but it can be added that their teaching while she was at Kent inspired her to remain in academia and generated her passion for learning law. Erika Rackley and Karen Devine also deserve thanks  for their input and the answers they gave to various questions as this project progressed. And, last but not least, thanks go to Mike Walters, who ended up holding the baby for many weekends and much of the summer. This book is dedicated to Francis, who was conceived around the same time as the idea for this project and born during the writing of it.

Finally - one further significant tradition. Despite all the help we have received, we know that mistakes may remain. We take full responsibility, we would be grateful if you could draw them to our attention, and we apologise if they confuse. Despite them, we hope you enjoy this resource and it provides you with a sound foundation for a stimulating legal education.



Acknowledgements

Grateful acknowledgement is made to all the authors and publishers of copyright material that appears in this online resource and accompanying textbook, and in particular to the following for permission to reprint material from the sources indicated:

    Blackwell Publishing: extracts from H Reece, 'The End of Domestic Violence' (2006), 96 (5) MLR 770

    Crown copyright material is reproduced under Class Licence Number C01P0000148 with the permission of OPSI and the Queen's Printer for Scotland

    Professor Dame Hazel Genn: PowerPoint slides written to accompany the presentation 'Mediation in England'

    Guardian News & Media Ltd: article 'Privy Council overrules Lords to put judgment back on track: Ruling reverses decision on provocation: Lawyer says murder move is retrograde step', The Guardian, 30 January 2006, copyright © Guardian News & Media Ltd 2006

    Tom Holmes: essay entitled 'The emergence of proportionality in judicial review has led to greater protection of human rights. However, it has also distorted the institutional balance between the judiciary, administration and Parliament.'

    Oxford University Press: extract f rom M Lunney and K Oliphant, Tort Law Text and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    Oxford University Press and the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxford: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies front cover

    Richard Alcock: example student essay on the use of statutory interpretation in Stevenson v Rogers

    Routledge: material adapted from A Franklyn-Stokes and S. E. Newstead, 'Undergraduate Cheating: Who Does What and Why' (1995), 20 (2) Studies in Higher Education 159

    Sage Publications Ltd and the author: Erika Rackley, 'Difference in the House of Lords' (2006), 15 (2) Social and Legal Studies 163, copyright © Sage Publications Ltd 2006

    The University of Michigan Press: exercise adapted from J. M. Swales and C. B. Feak, Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (The University of Michigan Press, 2004)

    The University of Kent Unit for Enhancement of Learning and Teaching for advice on plagiarism. www.kent.ac.uk/uelt/ai.

Every effort has been made to trace and contact copyright holders prior to publication. If notified, the publisher will undertake to rectify any errors or omissions at the earliest opportunity.


Each chapter of this resource was reviewed prior to publication by a number of academics and e-learning co-ordinators, and we would particularly like to thank the following people for their constructive feedback:

    Ray Arthur, University of Teesside
    Simon Askey, University of London
    Sheena Banks, University of Sheffield
    Vanessa Bettinson, De Montfort University
    Jo Boylan-Kemp, Nottingham Trent University
    Deveral Capps, University of Northumbria
    Sandra Clarke, University of Greenwich
    Karen Counsell, University of Glamorgan
    Dennis Dowding, Bournemouth University
    Sam Halliday, University of Liverpool
    Nicola Isaacs, University of Plymouth
    Lesley Lomax, Sheffi eld Hallam University
    Stewart Motha, University of Kent
    Janette Porteous, University of Lincoln
    Sue Prince, University of Exeter
    Tony Wragg, University of Derby
    Lucy Yeatman, University of Greenwich


We are also grateful to the following people for sharing their expertise, time, and experience in contributing to the video clips which form a key part of this resource:

    Hunsiye Akdogan
    Tamsin Arthur
    Poonam Bhari
    Jill Evans
    Hayley Gow
    Tom Holmes
    Rosemary Hunter
    Nick Jackson
    Ed Kirton-Darling
    Stephanie Le Couteur
    Viv Matthews
    Sarah McCracken
    Berenice Mulvanny
    Mark Pritchard
    Jon Viner
    Pete Walters
    Patrick Whetter
    Bianca Wu


Credits

For Credits click here